Posted by
Femalecentury on Thursday, July 24, 2008 7:46:53 AM
As for the here and now, there is as per my knowledge no other fuel that mankind is able to produce in unlimitted quantity which the individual car can run on but: Electricity. And when it comes to cars: there is no need and no demand for less cars. With today´s high fuel price policy only one thing is achieved: the commoner is not able to pay the fuel anymore, has to limit his mobility and thus decreasing the quality of his life and his lifestyle. Is that what is on the to-do list of politicians and environmentalists? Look at Tatta Automotive in India. Tatta brought out a Euro 1.700,00 car (= approx. USD 2.500,00). That is what people want. Access to cars, to mobility and to better living conditions for ALL! Odd thing is that this USD 2.500,00 car is petrol/gasoline driven. Means a couple of million people more want to make use of such an inexpensive car and contribute to drying up fuel resources.
The city of London is a good example: after introducing the "entrance" fee to the wider London citycenter area for fuel (petrol/gasoline) driven cars, Londoners switched to cars running on electricity. These cars are not subject to use restrictions in the London city center, i.e. the owners do not have to pay the standard "entrance" or environmental fee. Or to say it in other words: no Hybrid cars but fully electricity driven cars.
Only one hair in the soup: today´s standards of these electricity driven cars are such that the maximum distance the accumulator lasts is 60 miles. And then, the accumulator has to be re-charged. So, what is the problem with equipping the car with 3 or more accumulators to increase the distance level? Too heavy, to bulky and to cumbersome?
I am not a scientist and not a technician. But: if electricity can be generated via windmills / windwheels, what is the big issue with generating electricity via the wheels of a car? When the 1st accumulator is employed to make the car drive and make the wheels of the car turning, this movement can be used to generate electricity for uploading the other two accumulators in the car.
Does not sound futuristic to mee. I am inviting the comments telling why this should not be possible, neither in the long nore in the short run. Nisan is actually working on an accumulator for cars enabling increasing the distance possible to drive with one accumulator load to 400 miles. And these accumulators are said to be leight and environmental friendly, i.e. no excessive heat disposal.
What is the fuzz about mankind not being able to bring it to the next level?
I want to drive. And I want to be able to afford being mobile on an individual basis. Does it really need me to work on easy-to handle electricity cars?